Exploration The Role of Social Media in Shaping Social Perceptionsof Local Brands in Indonesia: A Qualitative Study of Generation Z
Keywords:
social media, social perception, local brand, Generation Z, qualitative researchAbstract
This study aims to explore the role of social media in shaping social perceptions toward local brands in Indonesia among Generation Z. In the digital era, social media platforms have become dominant spaces where social interaction influences consumer attitudes and brand image formation. This research applies a qualitative phenomenological approach to understand the lived experiences of Generation Z in interpreting and responding to local brand content on social media. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with selected informants aged 18–24 years who actively use social media. The findings reveal that social media shapes social perception through peer interaction, influencer credibility, user-generated content, and symbolic representation of identity. Local brands that successfully build emotional engagement and social relevance tend to gain stronger trust and loyalty. The study highlights that social perception is socially constructed through digital interaction rather than purely formed by traditional advertising exposure. These findings contribute to social marketing literature, particularly in understanding the intersection between social interaction and brand perception in emerging markets.
References
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002
Priporas, C.-V., Stylos, N., & Fotiadis, A. K. (2017). Generation Z consumers’ expectations of interactions in smart retailing: A future agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.058
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mirza Sahil, Salsabila Maisah Andani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




